Is Verticalization the Right Strategy for MSP Growth?

""

Terry Ledger鈥檚 first customer was a 鈥渞eally strange one.鈥

They were a semiconductor brokerage house. Think of it as a stock market for computer parts. If Acme Corp has an excess of one hundred thousand chips and Wayne Enterprises is mothballing production because they need one hundred thousand parts, the brokerage plays matchmaker.

As the founder of Network Coverage, a managed service provider (MSP), it was Ledger鈥檚 job to keep the brokerage鈥檚 systems running. But he quickly learned that the semiconductor stock market was a world unto itself, packed with intricate processes and complex software.

Perhaps understandably, Ledger didn鈥檛 niche down into the world of semiconductors. Instead, he pursued customers in a wide range of industries, securing clients in manufacturing, engineering, biotechnology, among others. During this exploration, he realized he was attracting more and more customers in one vertical: commercial construction.

Year by year, he acquired more construction expertise and developed a stronger reputation among building companies. Eventually, Network Coverage was seen as the MSP for construction businesses in the Greater Boston area. He says this process of verticalization was key to the success of his company.

If you aren鈥檛 familiar with the term, verticalization refers to specializing in specific industries, functions, channels, or regions. In the case of MSPs, it almost always means industry verticalization鈥攖hat鈥檚 specializing in banking, healthcare, life science, and so on.

Ledger isn鈥檛 alone in his support of the tactic, either.

Business leaders have been promoting verticalization for years. They promise that niched organizations will gain institutional knowledge, accelerate their marketing efforts, and enhance their reputation.

But the reality is less clear-cut. Alongside all the headline benefits are underappreciated risks and overlooked drawbacks.

For a balanced analysis of verticalization for MSPs, read on.

Learn the ropes鈥攐nce

There鈥檚 a lot of operational overlap between modern businesses. Almost all companies will have email. Most have a cloud storage platform. A lot will have some sort of security. But beneath the basic technology lies a layer of industry-specific technology.

Take architectural, engineering, and construction businesses鈥攋ointly known as AEC.

Whether you鈥檙e supporting an architectural firm, contracting business, or engineering practice, chances are they鈥檒l be using the same CAD, accounting, and proposal software. Once you鈥檝e worked with half a dozen AEC businesses, you鈥檝e worked with them all. That industry expertise is invaluable.

鈥淲e know all the AEC applications,鈥 says Ledger. 鈥淲e can circumvent the vendor and can provide most customers with first level of support. That鈥檚 opposed to escalating issues up to the vendor and relying on them getting back to us in a timely fashion.鈥

Tap into the marketing network effect

Think of your customer鈥檚 business as a premium saloon or coupe. When it breaks down, they鈥檙e not going to go to a generic dealership to get it fixed. They鈥檙e going to look for someone who knows what they鈥檙e talking about.

鈥淚f someone drives a Ford, they鈥檙e probably not going to bring it to the Chevy dealer to get it fixed,鈥 says Ledger. 鈥淭he Chevy guys know how to fix a Chevy. The Ford guys know how to fix Fords.鈥

It鈥檚 the same story in managed services. Legal firms will want someone who understands their security needs. Manufacturers want someone who gets CAD.

When you鈥檙e the go-to provider for a particular industry, that鈥檚 a powerful competitive advantage. In smaller or insular markets, the impact is magnified.

For example, most large construction company owners in any region will know each other. They鈥檒l attend the same conferences, see each other at cocktail parties, and recruit from a similar pool of employees. When they start talking about a provider as a specialist or expert in their field, that鈥檚 the strongest form of marketing you can ever get.

Repeatability and profitability

Consider two customers. One is a carbon copy of a different long-term customer鈥攕ame industry, organizational hierarchy, business processes, and so on. The other is unusual鈥攏ew geography, new sector, strange ways of doing business.

Of the two, which do you think will be more profitable? The first, of course. You鈥檝e probably spent less on marketing and sales to attract them. Your discovery and onboarding will run like a well-oiled machine. You鈥檒l likely predict any issues and anticipate any opportunities.

In short: When you work with similar customers, you can develop repeatable processes. You can work more efficiently, drive down costs, and carve out more profit.

Consider the drawbacks

Verticalization sounds like a silver bullet for MSPs. More expertise, stronger marketing, improved profitability. What鈥檚 not to like? Unfortunately, the practical reality isn鈥檛 quite so clear. Alongside all the benefits are a handful of serious drawbacks. Before driving a verticalization transformation, it鈥檚 important to consider them carefully.

First, verticalized businesses experience amplified negatives.

鈥淚n much the same way cocktail parties lead to referrals, they can bite you in the ass,鈥 says Ledger.

Any negative feedback or commentary gets heard by a significant proportion of your target market. Even if the claims are unfounded, untrue, or exaggerated, they still have a harmful effect. Say the power goes out in a city and an executive decides to blame their MSP. It鈥檚 not fair, but people will listen to their complaints.

Second, recruitment becomes harder. When you niche down into specific verticals, you鈥檙e adding another layer of challenge to talent acquisition. Not only do you have to find a competent tech, but you have to find one who understands the ins and outs of education, energy, or public sector work. If you can鈥檛 find the right people, you have to invest in specialized training and education to bring generalist new hires up to speed.

Finally, there鈥檚 an opportunity cost. By targeting one specific vertical, you are ignoring others. The markets and opportunities you overlook may be highly profitable and rewarding.

To verticalize or diversify?

Unfortunately, there鈥檚 no one answer. Each business has unique strengths, circumstances, and goals. Often, organizations will land somewhere in the middle.

Take Terry Ledger. Although he has an enviable reputation as the MSP provider for commercial construction companies, around 40% of his business comes from other industries.

鈥淲e have manufacturing and engineering,鈥 he says. 鈥淪ome biotech because of where we're based. We鈥檙e just north of Boston so biotech is an obvious one for us.鈥

When considering verticalization for your MSP, evaluate your own circumstances, weigh up the pros and cons, and make a choice that鈥檚 right for you and your business.

If you鈥檇 like to work with Network Coverage, you can contact them . And for more insightful perspectives from other expert MSP leaders, check out our Rockstars of MSP series here. In this series, we dive into several managed service partner success stories.